High Resolution performance timer

I recently stumbled across this issue because I was trying to compile some code on an ARM based computer. There was code in the program I wanted to compile that uses assembly! I am not going to get into the details over which method might be faster or has higher resolution. From what I have learned this is the most compact and portable code to use if you want a high resolution counter that can be used for something like performance profiling.

This was the original code that was causing the issue. This code depends on the x86 instruction set.


#ifdef _WIN32

   unsigned long long tick;
   QueryPerformanceCounter((LARGE_INTEGER )&tick); // works great on Windows ONLY
   return tick;

#else

 uint32_t hi, lo;
   asm volatile ("rdtsc" : "=a"(lo), "=d"(hi)); // Works well on x86 only
   return ( (uint64_t)lo)|( (uint64_t)hi)<< 32 );

#endif

Thanks to improvements on the POSIX based

int clock_gettime(clockid_t clk_id, struct timespec tp);

We can replace our not portable assembly code for our easy to use clock_gettime code like so


#ifdef _WIN32

   unsigned long long tick;
   QueryPerformanceCounter((LARGE_INTEGER )&tick); // works great on Windows ONLY
   return tick;

#else

   timespec timeInfo;
   clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, &timeInfo); // nanosecond resolution
   unsigned long long int nanosecs = ((unsigned long long)timeInfo.tv_sec)1000000000  +

                       ((unsigned long long)timeInfo.tv_nsec);
   return nanosecs;

#endif

Best of luck.

References:

http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/clock_gettime.2.html
http://tdistler.com/2010/06/27/high-performance-timing-on-linux-windows
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Precision_Event_Timer